tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-80741969241621005282024-02-18T20:48:56.281-06:00The Last Shall Be FirstHallelujah, Everybody Say CheeseSoletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.comBlogger792125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-64541033047043881392008-03-06T19:09:00.001-06:002008-03-13T07:50:18.426-05:00Last Night's Tipple<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.winelegacy.com/Images/ItemBottle/20071101/root1_1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.winelegacy.com/Images/ItemBottle/20071101/root1_1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>I finished the bottle of 2006 Root:1 Cabernet Sauvignon last night, and it held up well after being open a day. I am really surprised by the rhubarb on the nose. That's not an aroma that I have experienced before, and it's really strange to find it in a beverage made from grapes. I like it, though. I agree with the assessment from yesterday: this wine is a bit thin and short, but it is interesting and tasty and well worth the $8 I paid for it.<br /><br />The premise of the marketing schtick for this wine is that the ungrafted grapevines it is produced from produce grapes that have deeper flavor than grafted grapevines. This has been a common claim about grafted grapevines since their introduction began in the 1870s, and it's one of the principal reasons that grafted grapevines were illegal in Burgundy until 1887 despite the fact that phylloxera was devastating Burgundy vineyards to such an extent that the economic viability of winemaking there was in doubt. The only way to validate or falsify that assertion definitively would be to conduct a controlled experiment where both grafted and ungrafted vines of the same age and variety were planted in the same vineyard, which would allow us to compare the wines made from each and know that any differences between the two would likely be a result of whether the vines were grafted or ungrafted. Well, grafted and ungrafted vines don't generally exist in the same vineyard. There are regions (large parts of Chile and Argentina and some small parts of Australia) where vines are generally ungrafted, and there are regions where vines are not. The best evidence we have are evaluations of pre- and post-phylloxera wines from the same regions or vineyards, and those evaluations are pretty unanimous that the pre-phylloxera wines are better. Game, set, and match for ungrafted vines, right? Well, not really. The American rootstocks that were used for grafting carried American vine viruses with them, and these viruses were previously unknown in Europe. The spread like wildfire after the introduction of grafting, and it was many years before vinegrowers learned to combat them. So was it the grafting or was it the viruses that accounts for the decline in quality? Who knows.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-49599167105775631212008-03-05T21:40:00.000-06:002008-03-11T21:44:41.297-05:00In Praise of Mamacita<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Macaroni_and_cheese.jpg/800px-Macaroni_and_cheese.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/74/Macaroni_and_cheese.jpg/800px-Macaroni_and_cheese.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><a href="http://whatwouldjaneaustendo.blogspot.com/">Mamacita</a> makes some kick-ass macaroni and cheese. Seriously. Maybe if we heckle her enough, she'll post the recipe.<br /><br />(And that picture is just something that I stole from <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a>. It in no way represents the beauty that is Mamacita's version.)Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-78778087723814589722008-03-05T20:57:00.001-06:002008-03-11T21:59:59.636-05:00The DuchessGeorgiana, the Duchess of Devonshire, is a particularly interesting character from late 18th and early 19th Century British history. She was the daughter of the first Earl of Spencer (which makes her one of the ancestors of Diana, the Princess of Wales) and the wife of William Cavendish, the fifth Duke of Devonshire. Both her father and her husband were scions of the Whig party, and Georgiana was an important personage in the Whig party in her own right. She was a relentless campaigner for Whig candidates (particularly Charles Fox), and and it was largely her skill and determination that kept the Whigs together through the dark times during Pitt's ascendancy in the 1780s and 1790s. More than that, she was also the arbiter of fashion and the very center of fashionable aristocratic society. In other words, she might not have ranked in importance quite at the same level as William Pitt the younger, the great Prime Minister, but she's not that far behind.<br /><br />Georgiana has been the subject of a number of biographies, the most recent of which was Amanda Foreman's <i><a type="amzn" asin="0375753834">Georgiana: Duchess of Devonshire</a></i>, which is a pretty good read and a decent piece of scholarship (although I think that Foreman identifies a bit too closely with Georgiana). Well, period movie fans, Foreman's book is being made into a movie!<br /><br /><object height="355" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/1vtaV9Jop00&hl=en"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/1vtaV9Jop00&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="355" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br />It will be interesting to see what Hollywood makes of the story. Georgiana was a prominent figure on the British scene from the time of her marriage at age 17 until her death at age 49, and it looks from the <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0864761/">cast list</a> that the movie aspires to cover most of her life. That's unfortunate since it seems likely that it will cover none of it very well; but I will be looking forward to it anyway. Who knows? Georgiana's affair with Edward Grey (later Earl Grey, the guy that the type of tea is named after) might make for some good bodice-ripping action.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-84883103569134628512008-03-05T20:56:00.000-06:002008-03-11T20:57:14.008-05:00Today's ShoesVass wingtip bluchers in Color #8 shell cordovan with double leather soles (Banana last).Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-89639895626037140192008-03-05T20:29:00.001-06:002008-03-11T20:55:17.985-05:00Last Night's Tipple<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.winelegacy.com/Images/ItemBottle/20071101/root1_1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.winelegacy.com/Images/ItemBottle/20071101/root1_1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Last night's wine (the 2006 Root:1 Cabernet Sauvignon from the Colchagua Valley in Chile) was an impulse buy at Costco, and I began to regret the purchase as soon as I haded over my credit card at the register. I'm not a bit fan of Cabernet Sauvignon-based wines (probably a result of a psychological need to be different), and I have not had very good experiences with Chilean wines (most of what I've tried has been green and thin and not very appealing). In the store, though, I was won over by the stylish packaging, the price ($8, if I recall correctly), and the marketing schtick. Namely, the grapes used to make this wine are from ungrafted vines. Since the phylloxera destroyed European vineyards in the second half of the 19th Century, most of the world's commercial <span style="font-style: italic;">vitis vinifera</span> vines have been grafted. The grape-bearing part is <span style="font-style: italic;">vitis vinifera</span>, but it has been grafted onto roots from non-<span style="font-style: italic;">vinifera</span> North American grape species. North American non-<span style="font-style: italic;">vinifera</span> grape varieties, you see, are immune to the ravages of phylloxera, and the discovery that this was so saved the European wine industry. But phylloxera hasn't reached every corner of the wine world, at least not yet. Specifically, most of South America has never been visited by it, and so grafting is not nearly as widespread in Chile and Argentina as it is in the rest of the world. Root:1's marketing claims that the lack of grafting makes their grapes have a more intense fruit and varietally authentic character. I'm more than a bit suspicious of that claim, but I had to try it. And so I bought a bottle.<br /><br />Cabernet Sauvignon is famous for having a green streak. Given that one of its parents is the Cabernet Franc, which is about as vegetal as a red grape variety gets, this isn't particularly surprising. There is a good bit of green bell pepper on the nose, as befits a Cabernet Sauvignon wine. But there is also a very sharp and distinct rhubarb aroma. I like rhubarb. There is some decent red fruit on the palate, along with some olives. It's a bit thin and a bit short, but I still enjoyed it. It's better than most other Chilean wines that I have tried, and it offers good value for $8 a bottle. My impulses were good in this case.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-61429772389694223542008-03-04T20:44:00.000-06:002008-03-10T22:01:49.285-05:00Gift Cards and DJs<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://daveibsen.typepad.com/5_blogs_before_lunch/images/sharper.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://daveibsen.typepad.com/5_blogs_before_lunch/images/sharper.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a>This morning, the male half of the none-too-bright morning show pair that I am embarrassed to listen to while getting ready for work mentioned that The Sharper Image was no longer going to honor the gift cards that it had issued. It was completely unethical, he bloviated, just another example of big corporations screwing the little man. As usual when he expresses an opinion about something other than radio, his information was both misleading and incomplete.<br /><br />The Sharper Image has indeed <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/bankruptcies-often-leave-consumers-holding/story.aspx?guid=DCBBEB36-F293-4EDF-B2DC-1F515E91A746">suspended redemption</a> of the gift cards that it has issued. It has done so because it has filed for bankruptcy. This makes perfect sense. When a shopper purchases a gift card, it doesn't really represent revenue that a retailer can immediately book as income. Because the gift card is redeemable for goods and services, it really is a liability. That is, the company that issues the gift card has to produce something of value in exchange for the gift card at some future date. Money paid for a gift card isn't income for a company. It's a loan to the company. Redeeming the gift card represents paying off a debt to the card's holder. When a company files for bankruptcy, it is saying that it can no longer pay its outstanding debts; and it no longer has the ability to decide to pay some its debts but not all. That's a matter under the control of the bankruptcy court. In other words, <span style="font-weight: bold;">The Sharper Image couldn't have redeemed those gift cards even if they had wanted to</span>. Now, if The Sharper Image had continued to sell gift cards knowing that they were about to file for bankruptcy, that would have been unethical. But there is no evidence that they did so. So, idiot radio DJ, why don't you spend 5 minutes finding out what is really going on before you accuse someone of unethical conduct? Is that too much to ask?<span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-style: italic;"></span></span></span></span></span>Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-74137355106937328062008-03-04T20:32:00.001-06:002008-03-10T20:44:11.504-05:00Today's Shoes<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://img343.imageshack.us/img343/3407/dsc00709cz9.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px;" src="http://img343.imageshack.us/img343/3407/dsc00709cz9.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-weight: bold;">Day</span><br /><br />GJ Cleverley bespoke three-eyelet plain-toe bluchers in chestnut Russian reindeer with single leather soles. Cleverley's Russian reindeer is certainly something of a gimmick. I don't think that it's the most durable skin available, and I don't think that it is the most appropriate for shoemaking. In the 18th Century, when these skins were originally tanned, Russian reindeer leather was mostly used for bookbinding. The two centuries that it has spent on the bottom of the ocean off the coast of Plymouth probably didn't do wonders for it, either. I have heard reports that it splits fairly easily. Despite it all, though, I do love the skin and the shoes it can make. I have two pairs made from it, and I love them both. A friend of mine has recently been ruminating about whether he should bespeak a pair from Cleverley made from Russian reindeer and if so in what pattern. I think he's leaning toward a double buckle monkstrap cap-toe, something that I had never considered but that would be excellent. If he doesn't do it, I might. Heck, even if he does do it, I might.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Evening</span><br /><br />Alden long wing bluchers in Color #8 shell cordovan with reverse welts and double leather soles (model 975, Barrie last).Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-52645948469979600182008-03-04T20:03:00.001-06:002008-03-10T20:28:15.453-05:00Last Night's Tipple<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.vineconnections.com/labels/la_posta_bonarda_06.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.vineconnections.com/labels/la_posta_bonarda_06.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Last night, I finished off the remainder of the 2006 La Posta Bonarda that I opened on Sunday night. One writer that I read recently asserted that Bonarda was the Argentine Zinfandel: its European origins are undeniable but obscure, and it has only become respected and important in Argentina. The wine it produces is juicy and fruity and enjoyable but perhaps not of transcendent quality. That comparison seems pretty apt to me, at least if this La Posta is at all indicative of the kind of wine that Bonarda makes. It was an enjoyable on the second night as the first, although it wasn't profound. The only thing about it that makes me reluctant to purchase it again is the fact that I can get a lot of really good wines for $16 a bottle. That is, it's not the vest value in the world.<br /><br />Believe it or not, Argentina is the most important wine-producing country in South America and produces the fifth most wine per year of any nation in the world. Those little tidbits of trivia surprised me when I read them -- I had assumed that Chile, whose wines are ubiquitous in grocery and liquor stores around here, would have placed ahead of Argentina, but such is not the case. Even more surprising to me is the fact that the number of acres of vines under cultivation in Argentina and the wine production from them have fallen dramatically over the past 25 years. In the '60s and '70s, Argentina produced and consumed a staggering amount of wine. Virtually all of the wine produced was for domestic consumption, and the Argentines consumed more than 90 liters per capita per annum. Think about that for a minute: every man, woman, and child in Argentina drank 120 bottles of wine per year. And most of it was high-alcohol mass-produced plonk. Not coincidentally, the end of the military dictatorship in the early '80s ushered in a better era of viticulture, more commercial and more quality-oriented. Vast quantities of low-quality vines were ripped out, and winemaking practices improved dramatically. There are today a large number of high quality (and high price) Argentine wines on the world market, and that's a good thing.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-86304985114345366452008-03-03T22:38:00.002-06:002008-03-04T07:56:04.202-06:00Texas Presidential Primary<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.texascentraltitle.com/images/flag.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.texascentraltitle.com/images/flag.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a>The Texas Presidential primary takes place on March 4, and I think that it would be useful for those of us who live in the Lone Star State to understand how it works before we vote. The media tends to present this as a horse race, citing polls that show Hillary Clinton up by 4 percentage points or Barack Obama up by 2 points or whatever. That makes for a clearer story line, but it does not give a very accurate picture of which candidate is likely to win the most delegates. Let's discuss the relevant details of both the Republican and the Democratic primaries, starting with the Republican because it's a lot easier to explain.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Republican Primary</span><br /><br />Texas gets a total of 140 delegates. 96 of these are apportioned by Congressional districts, 3 for each of the 32 districts in Texas. If one candidate in a Congressional district gets 50% or more of the vote, he gets all 3 delegates for that district. If no candidate gets 50% of the vote but the candidate with the largest number of votes gets at least 20%, then the plurality candidate gets 2 delegates, with the candidate with the next highest number of votes getting 1 delegate. If no candidate gets at least 20% of the votes, then the top three candidates get 1 delegate each. There are also 41 at-large delegates, all of which go to a candidate who gets at least 50% of the statewide vote. If no candidate gets at least 50% of the vote but at least one gets 20% of the vote, then the candidates who get more than 20% of the vote split the delegates proportionate to their statewide votes. If no candidates get more than 20% of the vote, then all 41 delegates are apportioned among all of the candidates based on each candidate's vote total. The remaining 3 delegates are officials in the Texas Republican party, and they are uncommitted to any candidate. See <a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1975791/posts">here</a> for more information. In other words, John McCain might not take all 137 committed delegates, but he probably will take the vast majority.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Democratic Party</span><br /><br />Oh, boy, is this Byzantine. Texas receives a total of 228 delegates, and these delegates are assigned as follows:<br /><ol><li>126 are assigned on the basis of the results from the March 4 primary. These 126 delegates are apportioned by state senatorial district according to the number of votes cast in each district for the Democratic gubernatorial candidate in 2006 election. This means that more Democratic senatorial districts (for example, District 14) get more delegates than less Democratic districts (for example, District 31), and the delegate totals per district range from 2 to 8. Delegates are apportioned to presidential candidates based on the number of votes that the various candidates receive in the district.<br /></li><li>42 pledged at-large delegates and 25 pledged elected official delegates are elected by the state convention, which will be held on June 7, 2008. Delegates to the state convention are elected by state senatorial district conventions, which will be held on March 29, 2008. Delegates to the state senatorial district conventions are elected by precinct conventions, held at 7:15 PM on March 4, 2008 -- in other words, immediately after the polls close. The number of delegates that a precinct elects to the state senatorial district convention is proportional to the number of votes cast in that precinct for the Democratic gubernatorial candidate in the 2006 election. A similar scheme of proportional representation is used in apportioning delegates to the state convention by state senatorial district. At each convention level, delegates are apportioned to each presidential candidate on the basis of the preferences expressed by the people who show up to the convention. In other words, the number of delegates that each candidate receives at the state convention will be based largely on the number of supporters he or she turns out to the precinct conventions on election day.</li><li>3 unpledged delegates are elected by the state convention. These delegates are supposed to have distinguished themselves by their long-term service to the Texas Democratic Party. I don't believe that these will be truly unpledged -- that is, I expect them to be elected on the basis of who they likely will support at the national convention.</li><li>32 unpledged delegates are appointed based on their positions in the Texas Democratic Party. These are the so-called "superdelegates."</li></ol>See <a href="http://txdems.3cdn.net/11ae19646381305920_tom6bhhx8.pdf">this</a> Texas Democratic Party publication for more information. The long and the short of this is that the candidate who gets more votes in the primary might not even get the majority of the 126 primary-apportioned delegates. In fact, because Hillary Clinton has stronger support among Hispanic voters while Barack Obama has stronger support among black voters and because the heavily black state senatorial districts get more delegates than the heavily Hispanic senatorial districts, it is likely that Obama will get a majority of the 126 delegates even if Clinton wins more than 50% of the popular vote. In addition, if you feel strongly about either candidate and you can make it, it is in your best interest to attend the precinct conventions at 7:15 PM on March 4 -- doing so makes your preference disproportionately consequential.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-38321702126808135682008-03-03T22:34:00.002-06:002008-03-03T22:38:03.393-06:00Today's Shoes<span style="font-weight: bold;">Day<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span></span>Grenson Masterpieces three-eyelet austerity brogue blucher ankle boots in antiqued British tan calfskin with single leather soles.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Evening</span><br /><br />Gravati three-eyelet plain-toe bluchers in navy blue waterproof suede with microcellular rubber soles (15445, 433 last).<span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span><br /></span>Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-14565149667142530322008-03-03T22:01:00.003-06:002008-03-03T22:34:08.948-06:00Last Night's Tipple<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.vineconnections.com/labels/la_posta_bonarda_06.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.vineconnections.com/labels/la_posta_bonarda_06.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Bonarda is Argentina's second most widely-planted grape, after malbec. There is considerable uncertainty about what the Argentine bonarda actually is. It is <span style="font-style: italic;">vitis vinifera</span>, of course, which means that it originated in Europe or the Near East, and the name is Italian. The problem is that there are three different Italian grape varieties known as the bonarda, and there is evidence that the Argentine bonarda is none of these but instead might be the charbono. The matter could be settled by DNA testing, just like the research that proved that California petite sirah was mostly the grape known as durif in France. But Argentina doesn't exactly have the highest prestige level of all wine-growing countries, and bonarda doesn't exactly have the highest prestige level of all the grape varieties grown in Argentina. Ampelographers simply haven't gotten to it yet.<br /><br />Most of the Argentine wine that one sees on the US market are either malbec or one of the mass-appeal varietals like cabernet sauvignon or merlot. Bonarda bottlings are a little uncommon, but they can be found. I had heard about bonarda; and since novelty always appeals to me, I decided to seek it out. Spec's had two or three different versions, none of which I knew anything about. I selected the <a href="http://www.vineconnections.com/wines/la_posta_bonarda_06.htm">2006 La Posta Estela Armando Vineyard Bonarda</a> largely because I liked the label (when there is nothing else to judge a wine by, why not just go by the label?). The importer's website says that the grapes for this wine are from 45 year old vines cultivated by a family of Italian ancestry. There is a good deal of fruit on the nose, mixed with some earthiness and smoke. Towards the end of the glass, I thought that I smelled a bit of raspberries and cream and a bit of toast (as in Wonder bread). There was a lot of red fruit on the palate, along with a good deal of drying tannins. The finish wasn't particularly long, but that's okay. This was a concentrated and enjoyable wine. I think that it was a little overpriced at $16 a bottle, but trying new things is almost always a good idea.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-77112254548456867492008-02-24T19:55:00.002-06:002008-02-27T08:00:20.095-06:00Today's ShoesAlden half-brogue bluchers in dark brown long-nap suede with combination leather/rubber soles -- Alden calls them Commando soles, and they're actually full leather soles and heels with mini-lug rubber soles glued and stitched over them (Barrie last). These shoes were a special order that I placed years ago with <a href="http://www.alden-of-carmel.com/">Alden of Carmel</a>. Alas, Alden actively discourages special orders now, and most retailers won't do them because of Alden's hostility.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-58064809536628544772008-02-24T19:33:00.002-06:002008-02-27T07:53:56.311-06:00Last Night's Tipple<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.angelfire.com/art/wine/chione2.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.angelfire.com/art/wine/chione2.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Man, that picture didn't come through well at all. Oh, well. That's the best I can do.<br /><br />Anyway, continuing with the dolcetto theme, last night I opened a bottle of 2005 Chionetti Dolcetto di Dogliani San Luigi. The DOC is Dolcetto di Dogliani, and San Luigi is the name of the vineyard where the grapes were grown. In the Dolcetto d'Alba DOC, dolcetto is usually a secondary or tertiary grape, planted in less favorable locations by growers who reserve their best spots for nebbiolo and barbera. This is less frequently the case in the Dolcetto di Dogliani DOC -- more frequently, growers plant dolcetto and only dolcetto. This naturally causes them to take the grape more seriously than do some growers in the Dolcetto d'Alba DOC, and people who actually know something about this say that Dolcetto di Dogliani wines are typically heavier, more intense, and more age-worthy than Dolcetto d'Alba wines. Quinto Chionetti is a respected Dogliani producer, and he makes three single-vineyard dolcettos: Briccolero, Vigna la Costa, and San Luigi. My friendly, neighborhood liquor and wine superstore only carries the San Luigi, so that's all I can try (although I think that it would be fascinating to compare all three). It cost around $24 a bottle, making it about as expensive a dolcetto as you can find.<br /><br />When first poured, this wine didn't have much aroma at all. With some vigorous swirling, however, it really opened up. When it did, it had the same copper penny aroma as the Gagliardo I had previously. In addition, there was a big rose petal component and some meatiness. Yes, meatiness. I'm not sure exactly which meat -- maybe ham, maybe bacon -- but it's there. I like it a whole lot. On the palate, there's a lot of dark fruit and a lot of drying tannins. With the Gagliardo, at first it was a bit short -- I swallowed it, and it was gone. That changed with some time in the glass, but it was a bit disconcerting nonetheless. That wasn't a problem with this Chionetti. I like this wine a lot. I wouldn't go so far as to say that it was a great value, but it was very tasty; and I did enjoy it more than the Gagliardo (although they were close).Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-37070269472353747272008-02-23T22:09:00.000-06:002008-02-27T07:33:30.738-06:00Golf<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://spyhunter007.com/Images/pebble_beach_golf_course.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px;" src="http://spyhunter007.com/Images/pebble_beach_golf_course.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Anybody who has played golf on a Sunday knows that middle-aged men are the scourge of fast play. Not all of them, of course, and they are hardly the only offenders. However, far too many of them apparently believe that they have the skill level of Tiger Woods and that the rounds they are playing are as consequential as the final round of the Masters. On a typical hole, they will wait until the group ahead of them is 300 yards down the fairway before hitting their tee shots, which will almost invariably be dribbled into the rough maybe 100 yards. They will then wait for the group ahead to finish on the green before hitting their second shots, even though it would take a Woods-like effort with a one iron to reach the green. When they finally do hit their second shots, they will likely be 75 yard worm-burners that go another 75 yards in the rough. It will continue like this for another two or three shots until they are finally on the green, at which point the real slow-down begins. All putts must be examined from at least three different perspectives for not less than a minute at each perspective, and it is impossible for more than one player to line up their putts at the same time. The average round of golf on the weekend will take close to five hours, and this kind of slow play is the cause of it.<br /><br />The <span style="font-style: italic;">Wall Street Journal</span> February 16 Golf Journal column points out another factor leading to slow play, namely, course design:<br /><p class="times"></p><blockquote><p class="times">The average drive of a 90s-shooting male golfer is 192 yards. He thinks he hits the ball 30 yards farther than that, according to a survey of more than 18,000 golfers completed three years ago by Frank Thomas, the former technical director for the U.S. Golf Association. In fact, the survey found that 41% of men estimate they hit their drives 250-plus yards, which hard data from club manufacturers expose as total balderdash; in reality, maybe only one in 50 golfers routinely hits drives 250 yards. Senior men are lucky to coax 170 to 180 yards out of their tee shots. Typical female golfers drive about 135 yards.</p> <p class="times">If golf were somehow to reinvent itself from scratch, reflecting how the vast majority of participants actually play the game today, the default tees at courses would play at 5,700 to 6,300 yards. The forward-most tees, for beginners, some seniors and some women, would be at around 4,100 yards and get lots of use, and some courses would provide alternative tees set at, say, 6,700 and 7,200 yards, for the relatively few crack youngsters and low single-digit handicappers who can comfortably manage that length. (Scratch golfers constitute only 0.65% of the total.) ("<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120311057048072255.html?mod=Golf-Journal">A Tee Too Far: Long Courses Overmatch Golfers; Trying a New Way</a>" by John Paul Newport, p. W1)</p></blockquote><p class="times"><br /></p>There is a lot of sense in this approach to golf course design; and if golfers would comply, it would improve the golfing experience for everyone. The actual golfers would be happier because they would actually have a chance to play the course like it was designed to be played. They players around them would be happier because the speed of play would improve dramatically. But the first paragraph that I quoted points out the problem: the average golfer thinks that he's lot better than he actually is. He reads the coverage of the US Open, which tells about how the course being played this year will be 7,600 yards long. Not only does he think that he can play a 7,600 yard course, he is also insulted if you put tees out there for him to use that are only 5,400 yards. Delusions of grandeur are the main problem; golf course design is a subsidiary concern.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-4642393778642855442008-02-23T22:04:00.000-06:002008-02-26T07:09:45.334-06:00Today's ShoesGravati unlined three-eyelet plain-toe blucher boots in snuff suede with microcellular rubber soles (16899, 697 last). In recent years, Gravati, like all of the other Italian makers, has introduced elongated lasts, both square-toe and round-toe. Styles are changing a bit, and the most recent Gravati lasts are backing off of the elongated look a little bit. 697 is a new last, and it's not as snouty as some of the lasts from the past few years. Still, though, it is a bit snouty -- about 3/16" less length would be perfect. It otherwise is a very shapely and attractive last -- I like what Gravati has done here.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-36728623366795204772008-02-23T21:23:00.001-06:002008-02-26T07:04:26.292-06:00Last Night's Tipple<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.gagliardo.it/img/vini/8.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.gagliardo.it/img/vini/8.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>I finished the bottle of 2005 Gagliardo Dolcetto d'Alba last night, and it was as good or better than it was when I opened it the night before. This wine had a shelf talker recommendation from the Central Market wine buyer, and I will admit that that was what determined me on my purchase. The packaging seemed a bit too cutesy and marketing-driven for comfort; but when confronted with 7 or 10 wines of the same variety, all of similar price and none of them familiar, why not pay attention to a staff recommendation for one?<br /><br />Dolcetto is frequently referred to as the Italian version of Beaujolais in introductory wine books, and it's a comparison that causes umbrage for both proud Dolcetto producers and proud Beaujolais producers. The wine writers typically mean that both Dolcetto and Beaujolais are (relatively) cheap, soft, easy drinking wines best consumed young. In other words, they mean the comparison to be mildly pejorative or at least patronizing. Well, anyone who has ever tried Domaine Diochon Moulin-a-Vent or most of the other Beaujolais wine that Kermit Lynch imports knows that there is Beaujolais out there that is not just soft and easy-drinking and is age-worthy and "serious." I suspect that the same can be said for a lot of dolcetto. This Gagliardo Dolcetto d'Alba, I think, is not just some pleasant quaffer. It has plenty of acidity and tannin, mixed with plenty of fruit. I have no idea of whether it's age-worthy, but I do know that I have had plenty of purportedly "serious" wines that don't bring as much flavor, complexity, and interest to the table as this wine does. It really tastes nothing at all like Beaujolais, even excellent Beaujolais, but I think that the comparison of dolcetto and Beaujolais is justified for reasons not intended by the critics: both wines are under-appreciated and under-priced relative to their potential quality.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-55911548508910427932008-02-22T21:20:00.000-06:002008-02-25T21:22:47.441-06:00Today's Shoes<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.leathersoulhawaii.com/wp-content/uploads/wingal.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px;" src="http://www.leathersoulhawaii.com/wp-content/uploads/wingal.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>Alden long wing bluchers in dark tan alpine grain calfskin with a reverse welt and double leather soles (Barrie last) -- a <a href="http://www.leathersoulhawaii.com/2007/10/08/alden-shoes-a-blast-to-the-past/">LeatherSoul</a> special makeup and a recreation of a classic American shoe.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-90553606613213725672008-02-22T19:08:00.003-06:002008-02-25T07:05:24.047-06:00Last Night's Tipple<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.gagliardo.it/img/vini/8.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.gagliardo.it/img/vini/8.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>The three most important red grapes in the Piemonte region of northwestern Italy are nebbiolo, barbera, and dolcetto. Nebbiolo is by far the most renowned of the three, as it is used to make Barolo and Barbaresco, the king and queen of Italian wines. Barbera is the overshadowed child, with a good reputation in its own right but not one that can really compare to nebbiolo. Dolcetto is the red-headed stepchild of the three. It doesn't get much respect, either by wine critics (who often think of it as a simple, easy-drinking, and unserious wine) or by many growers, who relegate it to the second-rate vineyard locations and use its wine as a way to generate cash flow while their nebbiolo-based wines are maturing.<br /><br />Well, I don't really have an objection to a wine that is simple and easy-drinking so long as it's good, and I don't understand criticizing wine for being "unserious." What is that supposed to mean, anyway? Wine is, or ought to be, primarily a beverage to be enjoyed, not an intellectual exercise. I any event, I have read from people whose opinions I respect that dolcetto frequently makes enjoyable, delicious wine. So what do I care what the critics say? The bottle that I picked up (for around $15) is a 2005 Gagliardo Dolcetto d'Alba. The producer, <a href="http://www.gagliardo.it">Gianni Gagliardo</a>, has two separate lines. True to the stereotype, the upper of these two lines (Gianni Gagliardo) is almost exclusively nebbiolo-based, with one barbera and one favorita (a Piemontese white grape). Wines in this line probably cause some controversy amongst the critics because they all appear to be aged in small French oak barriques, which is a big departure from traditional winemaking techniques in the Piemonte (large Slovenian oak barrels, mostly used and approaching neutrality, were traditionally used). The lower line is called simply Gagliardo, and the producer calls the bottlings in this line "young family wines." In addition to the Dolcetto d'Alba, there's a Barbera d'Alba, a Roero Arneis (another white grape), and a favorita. None of them see any oak -- brief "aging" in stainless steel is it. That's fine with me. I'm not big on oak in wine, anyway, and I'm looking for a wine to drink now, not age for a few years.<br /><br />This wine has a very interesting nose (and in this case, "interesting" is good). The dominant note is this odd copper aroma -- take a stack of pre-1983 pennies and give them a whiff, and you'll know what I mean -- and it's mixed in with rose petals and a gamey note. I like it. It's juicy on the palate, with a good deal of dark fruit. There also is a not insignificant amount of tannin, and a good bit of acidity. My only real complaint is that it started out a bit short, but that changed a bit as it spent some time open and in the glass. Very enjoyable.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-25519291696632126192008-02-21T20:41:00.002-06:002008-02-24T15:53:49.083-06:00Pythons!<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b9/Python_molure_13.JPG/600px-Python_molure_13.JPG"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b9/Python_molure_13.JPG/600px-Python_molure_13.JPG" alt="" border="0" /></a>We're being overrun by pythons! It's time to panic! Abandon all hope and emigrate to Canada! At least, that's what <span style="font-style: italic;">USA Today</span> seems to hope that you'll do, based on the tone of the article that they put on the front page of today's paper.<br /><blockquote>As climate change warms the nation, giant Burmese pythons could colonize one-third of the USA, from San Francisco across the Southwest, Texas and the South and up north along the Virginia coast, according to U.S. Geological Survey maps released Wednesday.<br /><br />The pythons can be 20 feet long and 250 pounds. They are highly adaptable to new environments. ("<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2008-02-20-burmese-pythons_N.htm">Pythons could squeeze lower third of USA</a>" by Elizabeth Weise, p. A1)</blockquote><br />Burmese pythons are sold legally as pets in the US, with hatchlings going for as little as $20. Buyers frequently find that dealing with a full-grown python is extremely difficult, and they release the snakes into the wild. There is evidence that these released pets have established breeding colonies in places in the wild, particularly in the Florida Everglades. If you read the story closely, you'll notice that the US Geological Survey isn't exactly <span style="font-style: italic;">predicting</span> that pythons will colonize the lower third of the United States, just that the climate of the lower third of the United States could be hospitable to pythons if the one makes certain assumptions about the increases in temperature that global warning could bring by the year 2100. Now go back and count all of the caveats in that chain.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-63094994441706932542008-02-21T20:20:00.000-06:002008-02-24T15:28:29.234-06:00Today's Shoes<span style="font-weight: bold;">Day</span><br /><br />GJ Cleverley bespoke side-elastic shoes with twin-needle stitching on the apron in dark burgundy calfskin with single leather soles.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Evening</span><br /><br />Gravati three-eyelet half-brogue bluchers with a modified U-throat in antiqued tan calfskin (Gravati calls it Betis -- it's aniline-dyed calfskin treated with alcohol to strip the finish off partially to make it susceptible to neutral creme, which, when worked in, darkens the leather) with double leather soles with a central rubber plug (16407, 640 last).Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-39290539857763636692008-02-21T18:24:00.004-06:002008-02-24T15:16:07.933-06:00Last Night's Tipple<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.vanduzer.com/externals/3b/cc487fcf75861445e618344e8d484fb363e037.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.vanduzer.com/externals/3b/cc487fcf75861445e618344e8d484fb363e037.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>I finished the bottle of 2005 Van Duzer Vineyards Estate Pinot Noir last night, and it was just as enjoyable the second night as it had been the first. I didn't pick up the olive notes this time, but I did smell some floral components that I hadn't noticed before. In any event, I am very pleased with this wine, even at $25 a bottle. (And that $25 a bottle is a pretty good price -- I've seen it elsewhere for over $30. Costco's wine prices are very competitive.)<br /><br />Both Van Duzer and the Willamette Valley Vineyards pinot that I had earlier in the week prominently display the logo for an organization named <a href="http://www.liveinc.org/members.html">LIVE</a> (Low Input Viticulture & Enology) on their back labels, advertising the fact that their wines are LIVE-certified. Well, what the heck does that mean? LIVE is a non-profit organization of winegrowers "providing education and certification for vineyards using international standards of sustainable viticulture practices in wine grape production." It turns out that they are a sort of halfway house between conventional viticulture and organic or biodynamic viticulture -- that is, a rejection of the "better living through chemicals" school of winegrowing but a realization that herbicides and fertilizers are sometimes necessary to make vineyards commercially viable. I don't have the energy or enthusiasm to read exactly what a winery has to do to be LIVE-certified, but it certainly sounds like a good thing to me. I don't really believe that chemical-free agriculture necessarily produces better-tasting or healthier products, but at the same time I don't wine that stinks of sulfur dioxide.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-44315530356239198002008-02-20T21:06:00.000-06:002008-02-24T14:23:10.308-06:00On This Day<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.geology.wisc.edu/courses/g112/Images/paricutin.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.geology.wisc.edu/courses/g112/Images/paricutin.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>On this day in 1943, a fissure opened in a cornfield owned by Dionisio Pulido near the Mexican town of Paricutín. That fissure quickly grew into a volcano; and within a year, that volcano was over 1100 feet tall. Eruptions continued until 1952. Despite the fact that it destroyed Pulido's cornfield and the town of Paricutín, with lava flows eventually covering 10 square miles, nobody was killed in the eruption. The volcano has been silent since 1952, and vulcanologists believe that it is permanently extinct.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-91387130007832325922008-02-20T20:57:00.001-06:002008-02-24T15:19:52.761-06:00Today's Shoes<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.leathersoulhawaii.com/wp-content/uploads/boot1-1.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 320px;" src="http://www.leathersoulhawaii.com/wp-content/uploads/boot1-1.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><span style="font-weight: bold;">Day</span><br /><br />Alden high-lace wingtip blucher boots in dark brown (cigar) shell cordovan with double leather soles (Plaza last). These boots were special make-ups <a href="http://www.leathersoulhawaii.com/">LeatherSoul</a> in Hawaii. Cigar shell cordovan apparently has gotten very difficult to find, and Alden merchants are reporting wait times of many, many months or longer for their cigar make-ups. The good news is that LeatherSoul has been reordering these in Color #8.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Evening</span><br /><br />Gravati four-eyelet plain-toe bluchers in dark brown grained (Lama) calf with combination leather/rubber soles (16532, 640 last)Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-20759467555669076312008-02-20T18:58:00.002-06:002008-02-24T13:06:52.738-06:00Last Night's Tipple<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.vanduzer.com/externals/3b/cc487fcf75861445e618344e8d484fb363e037.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 200px;" src="http://www.vanduzer.com/externals/3b/cc487fcf75861445e618344e8d484fb363e037.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a>The skins of red grapes have tannins and pigments, and these tannins and pigments give red wine its backbone and color. The pinot noir grape, being a red grape, has tannins and pigments in its skin; but its skin is thin and consequently imparts much lower quantities of tannins and pigments than most red grapes, particularly the big boys like cabernet sauvignon and syrah. According to John Winthrop Haeger's book <a href="http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/10169/10169.ch01.html"><span style="font-style: italic;">North American Pinot Noir</span></a>,<br /><blockquote>[t]he thin skins’ tannins comprise only about 1.7 percent of the grape’s weight–as compared to 3 percent to 6 percent in most red varieties–and pinot’s anthocyanins, the soluble pigments that give most red wines their color, are present in less than half the quantity as in, for example, syrah.</blockquote><br />This means that most pinot noir wines don't have really deep color and are not particularly tannic. In fact, all too many pinots are pale and thin; and that has been my principal complaint about the pinot wines that I have been trying recently. I don't really want pinot to be an inky, tannic monster that coats my tongue with grape sludge -- finesse and subtlety are usually attributes to be desired in a wine, particularly a pinot, in my opinion -- but I'd like it to remind me that it isn't just water with alcohol and some red food coloring added.<br /><br />Costco is currently selling the 2005 Van Duzer Vineyards Willamette Valley Estate Pinot Noir for around $25 a bottle. When I saw it, I had never heard of Van Duzer Vineyards; but I liked the looks of the bottle and the shelf talker, and I bought a bottle. It was something of a risk -- insipid pinot noirs are all too common, even at high price points. Paying $10 for an insipid wine is merely disappointing. Paying $25 for one is actively infuriating. Well, fortunately, this Van Duzer pinot is not insipid. It's significantly darker than the other pinots that I have tried recently, and it also has more concentration and tannic backbone. There's some earth and some cherries on the nose, as well as olives. Yes, olives. Strange, at least to me, but not at all unappealing. There is a good deal of bright cherry fruit on the palate, and the wine has a nice bit of acidity, which I like. I wouldn't say that I have found the Holy Grail of pinot noir, but at least I found one that I like a good bit.<br /><br />(It turns out that <a href="http://www.vanduzer.com/">Van Duzer Vineyards</a> was founded in 1989. They primarily make pinot noir, although they do make some pinot gris. All of the grapes that they use are grown on their own estates -- no purchased grapes. There are two separate lines: the lower-priced Estate line and the higher-priced Reserve line, which appears to be made up exclusively of single-vineyard wines. Based on my experience with the Estate pinot noir, I'd certainly be willing to shell out another $10 a bottle to try one of the Reserve wines.)Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8074196924162100528.post-189486838758015362008-02-19T19:51:00.000-06:002008-02-21T08:01:55.675-06:00Campaign Ads<object height="350" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cNY4gfSPRts"><param name="wmode" value="transparent"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cNY4gfSPRts" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed></object><br /><br />The last competitive state-wide election in Texas that I can recall was in 1994, when George W. Bush upset Ann Richards to win the governorship for the first time. Since then, Republicans have swept just about every statewide race. Regardless of how you feel about the political results of this dominance, you have to admit that one positive consequence is that there usually aren't many campaign ads on television. The 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections might have been exceptionally close, but you wouldn't have known it from watching TV ads in Texas. Both parties knew that George W. Bush would win Texas in a landslide, and so neither campaign spent any time or effort campaigning here. Given the vapidity of almost every political ad that I have ever seen on TV and how even ones supporting positions and candidates that I like enrage me with their shoddy logic and their manipulative presentation, I think that this is a good thing.<br /><br />But Texas actually matters this time around. The conventional wisdom is that Hillary Clinton needs to win the Texas and Ohio primaries on March 4 in order to keep her presidential campaign viable. And so, for the first time in twelve years, we have been inundated with Clinton and Obama commercials. Yippee. I don't know how you people who live in battleground states stand it.Soletrainhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09749296849848810881noreply@blogger.com0