Showing posts with label socks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label socks. Show all posts

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Mountains of Socks

In many ways, we are living in the Golden Age of socks. While some of the classic sock patterns (like clocks, where a pattern forming a single stripe down the side of the sock all the way from the toe to the top of the sock) are difficult to find, the availability of high-quality, interesting socks is greater now than it has been at any point in my life. Maybe things were different in the '30s and '40s, I don't know. But I do know that ankle-length wool-blend solid color Gold Toe socks were about the best that one could find when I was growing up and that so much more is now easily obtainable.

So what makes a good sock? To me, there are four aspects. First, it must fit. The heel of the sock must actually hit the heel of the foot wearing it, or the sock will rub against the shoe and against the foot and be uncomfortable and short-lived. In addition, the sock must not be baggy around the ball of the foot, or the excess fabric will ball up and feel like a stone in your shoe. And the elasticized ribbing at the top of the sock must not be too constricting. Second, it must be comfortable. Obviously, a sock must fit to be comfortable; but good fit is not enough to ensure comfort. It should not be scratchy against the leg, and it should not be overly hot. In addition, any seams on the sock should not irritate the foot. Third, it should not sag or droop. There are few things more annoying than feeling your socks pool around your ankles. As a practical matter, this means that the socks must either be over-the-calf (ie, long enough to go over the bulge of the calf, making the calf an obstacle to the ravages of gravity), or they must be worn with sock garters. Apparently, the British mostly choose to wear mid-calf socks with sock garters. I wouldn't even know where to find sock garters, and I would not be comfortable wearing them; consequently, I opt for over-the-calf socks. Fourth, it must be visually interesting. This does not necessarily preclude a solid-color sock, but it must stand out somehow, through the vibrancy of its color or the way a combination of fiber types causes it to shine or something else.

There are many different makers of fine socks, and each of the makers has several different lines of varying qualities and fibers. I can't claim to have tried all or anywhere close to all of the makers, much less all of their lines. But here's what I do know:
  • Pantherella is the most widely known of the luxury sock makers, and the value of the Pantherella brand is by far the greatest. If I were starting out in the sock business with nothing except the Pantherella brand, I could be rich in a few years. Pantherella makes everything and is distributed everywhere. For many years, its socks have been the mainstays in both my work and leisure wardrobe because they stay up reasonably well, they fit reasonably well, and they are reasonably long-lived. The best socks I own -- the over-the-calf Sea Island cotton lisles -- are Pantherellas. Despite all of this, though, I think that Pantherella is a bit lacking. First, they use too much nylon in most of their socks. The nylon improves durability, of course, but it does so at the expense of comfort. This is most apparent in their merino socks, which are scratchy. In addition, most Pantherella are about two inches too short -- ideally, over-the-calf socks should go up to the base of the knee. Pantherella socks, for the most part, barely clear my calf and are consequently prone to sag somewhat during the course of the day. While the colors offered in the Sea Island lisle are excellent, they're solid colors; and Pantherella really struggles with bringing that same color vibrancy to their patterned socks. Pantherella makes a good sock, but there are better options out there. Here are some claimants in alphabetical order:
  • Bresciani -- Most independent men's stores that I have shopped in carry Pantherella for most of their basics and some other maker for their most interesting socks. Bresciani is often that second maker. This is a little bit mystifying to me, since I'm told that Bresciani does not maintain stock of anything, which makes wait times for fill-ins too long to be practicable. In any event, I have never liked Bresciani socks much, mostly because they shrink a lot in the wash and end up too short. In addition, the designs that I've seen, while more interesting than most of what Pantherella puts out, still aren't very interesting.
  • Facenti -- I am told that Facenti does most of its business as a private-label maker for some of the big-name Italian tailoring brands (Kiton, Zegna, and others). They also make socks under their own labels (Facenti and another one that I can't remember), though, of varying quality. I have four pairs of socks from Facenti. One is a beautiful pair of 100% cotton pique socks in navy with green stripes, and these socks are miraculous. Despite being 100% cotton, they hold their shape excellently, stay up, and don't shrink. I was convinced that they would degrade with washing, but they haven't yet. The other three pairs are blends of cotton and nylon (80%-20%, I think), and they are less excellent. They are visually interesting (intricate, multi-width stripes in all cases), they stay up, and they fit. However, less care is given to the toe seam then with the other pair. It's bulky, and the ends of it can get a little uncomfortable with a little wear. Nevertheless, I am eagerly awaiting the day when these socks are widely distributed in the United States. The socks pictured above are made by Facenti, and I think you will agree that they are beautiful.
  • Falke -- Surprisingly enough, Falke is a German brand. They don't have a lot of distribution in the United States, and what distribution they have is outrageously expensive -- up to 50% more than their most expensive competitors. They also apparently only make sized socks -- real sizes, not the Regular and Large that most manufacturers offer. The socks appear to be very well made; the toe seam, for example, is as flat as I have ever seen (although the ends of the linking thread are a bit longer than they should be). They are either all or almost all natural fibers, and yet they appear to hold their shapes very well. My complaint with Falke is three-fold. First, they make boring socks. Perhaps some of their socks somewhere are something other than solid, but I have not seen them. Second, they don't do color very well. With the exception of their scarlet cashmere socks, which are excellent, all of their non-dark colors are washed-out and ugly. It's true that their wool-silk socks are beautiful in dark colors, but I don't just want a sock wardrobe of charcoal and dark brown. Third and most seriously, they don't fit well: they're baggy around the forefoot. I don't think that I'll be buying more of these.
  • Marcoliani is an Italian manufacturer that has recently expanded its presence in the United States. They make just about every kind of socks imagineable -- solids, stripes, dots, herringbones, bird's eyes, everything. The socks fit better than Pantherella, mostly because they are longer. They also feel better than Pantherella, mostly because they have more natural fiber content. The merino socks, for example, are something of a revelation. I had believed that merino socks would always be scratchy. Marcoliani merino socks are not scratchy. Marcoliani's designs are consistently interesting, and their color palette is excellent. I have two complaints. First, they don't seem to understand how to do red -- all of their reds are either have too much orange or too much burgundy. Second, they really need to do a better job on the toe seam. It doesn't really bother me while I'm wearing the sock, but it sure bothers me when I am examining it. It's much too bulky for my taste.
  • VK Nagrani (Ovadafut) -- These socks have become very popular in recent years, and I can understand why. They certainly are interesting, coming in a wide variety of colors and designs. I don't think that the quality is really there, though. They're too thick, and they only come in mid-calf length. Furthermore, the elastic rib at the top is too constricting and makes the sock uncomfortable to wear for an entire day. And the toe seam problem for them is significantly worse than it is for Marcoliani. These are not inexpensive socks, and they should be better for the price.

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

On Socks

Socks are under-appreciated clothing items. Most men buy them as an afterthought in plain colors, caring nothing but that they should be as inexpensive as possible. This is a mistake. Buying interesting socks is one of the easiest and least expensive ways to inject interest and variety into an outfit. Think about it: suppose you're wearing a medium-gray suit with a plain white shirt and a lavender tie. Plain medium-gray socks to match the trousers is perfectly correct. It's also perfectly predictable and perfectly boring. What if you were to wear lavender socks to echo the color of your tie instead? That would be much more interesting, but it wouldn't be at all ostentatious. They're socks, and so they aren't constantly on display. Have a little fun. It won't kill you.

And what should you look for when buying your fun socks? First, they should be composed mostly of natural materials. That is, they should be at least 65% of either wool or cotton. (Unlike tailored clothing and shirts, it is possible for socks to be good and still have a certain percentage of artificial fibers in them. In fact, in most cases, at least some artificial fibers are necessary to make the sock durable and able to stay up.) Some people like wool better than cotton, some people like cotton better than wool, and some people have preferences that vary with the temperature. Ultimately, you should wear whichever one you like better (I like cotton -- even the best wool is too scratchy for me). The important thing is that they not be mostly something artificial like nylon. Nylon socks wear well, but they don't breathe. Socks should be comfortable. Which brings me to the second characteristic of a good pair of socks: they should have hand-linked toes. Socks have a seam across the top of the toes. This seam can either be machine-linked (in which case it's very bumpy) or hand-linked (in which case the bump is hardly noticeable). Hand-linked toes are more comfortable. (The Marcoliani socks pictured above have a machine-linked toe seam, but they're so beautiful that I have had to buy them anyway). The third characteristic is that they be over-the-calf. If they are mid-calf and your calves have any degree of taper to them at all, they won't stay up. Feeling socks bag around my ankles is one of the more unpleasant clothing sensations I can think of. This is not a problem with over-the-calf socks because they hit above the point that the calves begin to taper. I think a lot of men believe over-the-calf socks to be uncomfortable, but I have not found this to be the case.

And where can high-quality, interesting socks be found? Well, I have already written about Facenti, which are miraculous and amazingly attractive (although hard to find in the US). Two other Italian companies making great socks are Gallo and Marcoliani. And then there's Pantherella. Pantherella makes a lot of boring socks, and they sometimes struggle with more exotic colors; but they make some great over-the-calf Sea Island cotton socks in a riot of colors. These are among the best socks that I have ever worn, and you would do well to seek them out.

Friday, October 19, 2007

Today's Sock Review

The problem with most 100% cotton socks is that they don't maintain their shape well, and they don't stay up. As the day goes on, they tend to bag and to sag; and these tendencies are enhanced with every washing that they go through. That's why most cotton socks aren't 100% cotton; the cotton is instead blended with between 15% and 40% nylon (which also improves the durability of the sock). Facenti socks aren't in any way normal, however. They're 100% cotton, and they feel and look great. They also stay up. All day. Even after several washings. I don't understand how they manage to accomplish this, but they do. It's a miracle of technology.

Facenti is a venerable Italian company, manufacturing socks since 1923. They're virtually unknown in the United States, however, although they are apparently trying to break into the US market. Here's to hoping that they succeed. They make a sock demonstrably superior in construction to Pantherella, the mainstay of the US luxury sock market, and Facenti's design sensibility puts Pantherella's to shame.